Public Meeting Summary – “Building the West Gosforth we want” 24/8/2016

“Building the West Gosforth we want” Public Meeting at Trinity, hosted by Chi Onwurah MP our MP, with speeches by:
– Catherine McKinnel, Newcastle North MP
– Councillor Ged Bell, Cabinet Member for Investment and Development
– Graham Grant, Head of Transport Investment
Facilitated by Newcastle Digital Civics Department, Newcastle University

With the Blue House plans being shelved and the announcement that the Council would engage with community groups and stakeholders, the potential for noisy expressions of anger were diminished.  The meeting was in the main refreshingly positive and civil.  It was clear that the Blue House plan had galvanised our community.

Key operational points:
– There is no plan B. The next plan for the junction would be designed with community engagement.
– There are a number of other designs which are available and these can be used to inform a new design.
– All data used to produce the first plan will be made available, together with the assumptions that were used influence the design.
– The working group will be made of a maximum of 20 individuals. NCC will produce a list of invites in the next few days.
– The target date for the first meeting is 5/6 September.
– The plan for Blue House is hoped to be finalised by Christmas 2016
– Council will provide a terms of reference.
– The working group will not have decision making authority.

Digital Civics (the biggest group of its kind in Europe!) facilitated break out sessions and will provide a summary of the discussions. Digitial Civics are particularly interested in using technology to enable civic engagement, which we welcome to help get young people engaged, as a lot were on the March on Sunday.

In our summary of our own event last week, we left you with the following questions to consider when responding to the Consultation:
– What sort of a city do we want to live in?
– How do we get around?
– What sort of a city do we want our children to inherit?
– What do we need to change to achieve it?

Similar series of questions were raised by all of the speakers. These were used as a basis for the breakout sessions. Blue House inevitably dominated the discussion in the breakout sessions.

There was a clear desire from the majority of feedback from the breakout sessions that the community wanted less vehicles traversing the community and the city.  There was a repeated demand for transport options which provide alternatives to driving including integrated public transport, cheaper public transport, better park and ride, safe cycle lanes, and slower speeds.

We look forward to working with Council and other groups.

In the meantime, we have a number of concerns. The discussion is dominated by Blue House (understandably) while questions around Haddrick’s Mill plans remain.  As we discussed in our submission to the consultation, we looked at the impact of the Northern Access Corridor from Blue House to Haddrick’s.  We also raised a number of opportunities to improve the residential areas running it’s length by stopping rat running.

Blue House has a ripple effect on the whole area and we hope the Northern Access corridor is included in the terms of reference.

These could be quite remarkable times where we do actually end up building the West Gosforth we want. All the time protecting and celebrating our green spaces, with cleaner air, a place where it is safe and pleasant to walk or cycle. Somewhere for our children to be proud to inherit.

It’s up to all of us to make it happen!

newcastle needs you

One thought on “Public Meeting Summary – “Building the West Gosforth we want” 24/8/2016

  1. Paul Bennison

    It would be good to know who the 20no individuals are that make up the working group and also how these individuals and the council are to consult with the wider community in order to ‘help re-design’ the BHR.
    My signing up to receiving emails from SPACE should not give me any special privileges over being a resident of this city.

Comments are closed.